On May 1, 2024, in Design Gaps, Inc. v. Hall, 23CV040664-590, North Carolina’s business court dismissed an interior design company’s trade secret claim for failure to sufficiently plead the existence of trade secrets. The business court found that the “vague and conclusory” list of trade secrets that plaintiffs pled
L.D. Jones
Larenz Jones is an associate in the Labor Department and a member of the Employment Litigation & Counseling Group.
Contact:Read more about L.D. Jones
N.J. District Court Denies Bid for TRO for Failure to Identify Trade Secrets, But Still Allows Case to Proceed
By L.D. Jones & Steven J. Pearlman on
On November 9, 2023, in Ho-Ho-Kus, Inc. v. Sucharski, No. 2:23-cv-01677, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey found that Ho-Ho-Kus, Inc. (“HHK”) failed to show a trade secret existed with adequate specificity to justify granting a TRO or a preliminary injunction, but nevertheless denied a motion to dismiss arguing that the company failed to sufficiently plead the existence of a trade secret.